Wed 10 Jun 2009 2:23 pm
The number of farmers markets in the U.S. is growing fast, but sales aren’t keeping pace with that growth, according to a new study from the U.S.D.A.
Nearly 30 percent of all seasonal markets in the U.S. are less than five years old, and “most still appear to be establishing themselves economically,” with fewer vendors, fewer customers, and monthly sales that total only half the national average. The disparity raises questions “as to whether current levels of industry growth can be sustained over time,” the study said.
The study is based on data collected in 2006, focusing on the 2005 season. In farmers market years, that already feels like a long way back — I’d be curious to see more up-to-date data. Certainly, in our area, the number of markets has risen sharply even since 2005.
Coincidentally, I had been talking with Chris Curtis of the Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance for an unrelated story I’m doing on the city’s new 2009 farmers markets (watch for that next week), and she suggested that the saturation point, at some level, is here.
“Some markets cannibalize each other. They need to be sited so that they serve a specific population, which isn’t easy. I’d love to see Seattle do what Portland has done – which is a city funded study of farmers markets; how many can the city support, where should they be sited; what food dollars can realistically go through a farmers market, how many farmers need to be involved, etc.,” she wrote.
“Another crucial challenge is the supply of farmers. Everyone wants a farmers market, but our farmers are getting stretched kind of thin these days – although they’ve grown with the movement and some are able to do 15 – 20 markets a week. I still don’t see a new generation of small scale direct market farmers on the horizon.“
One of the conclusions from the national study was that organizers need to avoid cannibalizing when setting up new markets, focusing on densely populated or heavily trafficked areas that aren’t already served. Of course, given Seattle’s neighborhood focus, I suspect that “served,” for most residents, means they want a market in their own neighborhood, not in the 5-mile radius the study seems to suggest.
Other interesting pieces of data from the study:
- The Western region (including the Northwest) leads the regional pack, by far, in average monthly sales per farmers market. (We averaged close to $57,000; second place went to the mid-Atlantic region, at around $41,000.)
- Markets were open 4.5 months per year on average, but staying open seven or more months is a sign of success. Year-round markets reported more than three times the sales of markets operating 6 months or less, had more than twice the number of vendors, and slightly more than six times the weekly customers. But the growth wasn’t linear: Seasonal farmers markets that operated for 7 or more months performed similarly to markets that were open year-round.
- Markets that sold organic products performed better than markets that did not. In the Western region, nearly three quarters of markets had at least some organic products available; in the Southwest the number drops to only 30.4 percent.
- The number of farmers participating in markets has significantly increased. But the number who used farmers markets as the only outlet for their products is down slightly from an earlier report (25.2 percent, compared with 28.5 percent).
- Market managers across the country reported the same top three priorities: Support for market advertising/publicity, strategies for overcoming low customer attendamce, and strategies for boosting vendor sales. (Note: I can’t determine from the graph whether managers felt there were problems with attendance or sales, or whether those are just natural priorities under any circumstances.) In the West, about half were concerned with availability of parking, and about a third (only a third?) with availability of bathrooms for customers.
- Fresh produce, fruit, and vegetable vendors comprised 45 percent of farmers market vendors nationwide in 2005, followed by vendors selling “herbs and flowers” (15.4 percent), “honey, nuts, or preserves” (8.8 percent), “baked goods” (8.6 percent), and “crafts or woodworking” (8.3 percent). Even though sizable numbers of market managers reported that their markets offered meat and dairy products for sale, the actual number of farmers appears to be quite limited—only about 3 percent of vendors were reported to sell meat and poultry, and only 1.5 percent were reported to sell milk and dairy products.
The study drew on data from surveying 1,292 market managers nationwide, representing about 30 percent of the markets in the U.S. in 2005.
9 Responses to “ How many farmers markets is too many? ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[...] Seattle Post-Intelligencer food writer Rebekah Denn wrote about a recent study on the growing number of farmers markets and asks at what level we reach the [...]
-
[...] Eat All About It has an interesting take on the explosion of farmer’s markets, asking if there actually be too many of them now. Based on a major 112-page study by the USDA that found the newer farmer’s markets aren’t doing as well as older, well-established markets, is it possible this is actually true? The study is from the 2005 season, which means there are probably hundreds more at this point. [Eat All About It] [...]
A farmer’s market just opened up on my street (NE 100th) in Meadowbrook, at the Waldorf School. I have no objection to it. In fact it’s a plus, since there is not even a convenience store close by. However, I wonder how much thought went into it. For one thing, there is no sidewalk on this street, and the market draws walking and biking families. So parents and kids on tandem bikes, and parents with strollers are walking in the narrow street where there is increased auto traffic also. Does anyone look at this level of detail before the market is allowed?
I think the Seattle farmers’ market scene is far from saturated. Can’t recall the exact statistics, but I believe the percentage of our total food dollars being spent at farmers’ markets is something like 2-3%. Perhaps there are enough markets in Seattle to supply that amount of food, but everyone involved in the farmers’ market scene would like to see that small percentage increase. There’s certainly been a growing awareness lately about the importance of eating locally, which can only translate over time to increased demand.
It’s weird to hear talk of markets “cannibalizing” each others’ sales. There may be some healthy competition starting up between markets serving the same communities, but I think that ultimately that can benefit the whole scene, as different markets and different market organizations define their particular niches.
I’ve been to the Meadowbrook Farmers Market twice now and agree with the earlier poster - the street is not ideal for hosting such an event. Opening day was busy and fun, but last week vendors were opening complaining about how few people had attended that day. One vendor had hired extra help based on opening day volume and ended up sending them home when they realized turnout was not going to compare.
In addition, the makeup of vendors was primarily non-farmstand in nature. Only 4 vendors were farms, one was only selling CSA shares (no actual produce to purchase) and two of them didn’t offer anything organic. There is a shellfish vendor, but no meat or dairy. 2 of the vendors are selling street food, at least one is selling “herbal tonics” and our local bakery is the only bread option. I LOVE being able to get a scoop of Poco Carretto gelato, but overall, I’m concerned that the market won’t even last the season. Between the Wallingford, Phinney Ridge, Lake City and U District markets, can the area sustain another?
A couple points:
1. Markets cannibalizing each other is a problem, but I think an even greater problem facing farmers markets, especially new ones, is on the supply side: there simply are not enough direct market farmers to vend at all of the markets! We need to get more farmers on the land, producing for our communities.
2. Devra, I agree with you that we need to increase the percentage of local food dollars spent in the region, but farmers markets are only a piece of the puzzle. To really increase dollars spent on local agriculture, we also need to get local food into schools, hospitals, corporate office parks, restaurants, grocery stores, corner stores, anywhere people eat. Also, increase other direct marketing opportunities like CSAs and U-picks.
Increasing the number of farmers markets is great, but it’s only one way to reach consumers. To really increase local food consumption and dollars spent on local food we also need to take a systemic approach.
Best,
Mark
I’ve been vending at the Meadowbrook Farmers’ Market the past two weeks. It’s easy to scoff at it because it’s small, but I was vending at the Fremont Farmers’ Market–which evolved into the awesome Ballard Farmers’ Market–when it wasn’t any bigger than Meadowbrook is now. Markets take time. It’s no coincidence that the biggest markets in the city are also the ones that have been around longest. If you want a more impressive selection, go to one of the bigger markets. If you want to help nurture something innovative and young, then slow down and recognize what the Meadowbrook market has to offer.
They may not have a lot of farmers, but they’ve managed to find a few who aren’t vending at any other Seattle markets. For all the talk about there not being enough new farmers, these guys have managed to find a few. Also, the market takes place on private property, so they don’t have to deal with street use permits or the perpetual insecurity that other markets face about whether they’ll even have a site next year. They’re not looking to be another U-District or Ballard. They’re primary goal is educational, and they’re working to build something that reaches a specific community, and to watch it grow over time.
I was at the Meadowbrook market on the 14th. Looking forward to it growing, it was nice there was parking, that is my gripe about the University market. Meadowbrook is close enough that I could bicycle there. I am concerned about growth space there; doubling the number of vendors will make it feel cramped I think, unless they give up parking spaces. And as it grows, the neighbors may complain.
Devra, how is their primary goal educational? I mean, I know it is a school site, but really, isn’t the goal to give farmers an outlet and consumers a local choice?
Perhaps I should have said “one of their primary goals.” The educational emphasis was the aspect of the market that the organizers stressed when they first contacted me about vending there, and it’s something that no other local market does to the same degree. This past Sunday they had a 2-hour demonstration on how to build a backyard cob oven, and there have been similar events every weekend. Check out their website at http://www.meadowbrookfm.org.